The Voice of Liberty

Last week was significant both nationally and here in Colorado. Nationally, the president came out of the closet in favor of civil unions. No real surprise there. In North Carolina, an amendment to define marriage as between a man and a woman passed by 61% of the vote, making that state the 31st state to affirm traditional marriage.
Here in Colorado the legislative session expired with a civil unions bill left unpassed by the House. Thirty bills were in fact left hanging at the end of the session but homosexual activists and the media focused on that one bill. Democrat Governor Hickenlooper wasted no time in calling for a special session to consider civil unions, reportedly “emotional” as he made the announcement.
Is all this coincidence? I think not.
Here in Colorado, homosexual activists Tim Gill, Pat Stryker and Jared Polis bankroll the activities of the Democrat Party. How much is hard to say but if you read The Blueprint, you are left with the impression that the Gang of Four (the above three plus Rutt Bridges) bought Colorado for the Democrats in 2006 and 2008.
Hickenlooper and the Democrats owe them.
In 2006, despite Democrat gains in the legislature, Amendment 43 specifying marriage as between only one man and one woman passed with a 55% vote. Referendum I, to establish domestic partnerships, failed at 47%.
In Colorado, amendments and initiatives are suggested by the people and petitioners must gather signatures. Referenda are referred by the legislature and only need to be passed by them. In 2006 both methods were used and the result was clear.
What is happening now is simple: Having failed at the ballot box and despite knowing that the majority of Coloradans do not favor same-sex unions, the Democrats—beholden to the homosexual lobby for funding—are trying to ram it through in a special session of the legislature.
Never mind that it is really not an issue of equity or fairness: two members of the same sex are free to enter into any contract or make any agreement that married couples can. It is about nothing less than securing legal recognition of “gay marriage.” The proposed bill makes that clear in all but name.
The Republican leadership in the House has been singularly inept in killing the civil unions bill in the regular session, missing two good chances in committee. Speaker McNulty and Majority Leader Stephens may have thought they had finally succeeded when the session ended but then the issue became a national one and Hickenlooper took up the standard from the Obama campaign…or was told to.
Rumors from the capitol indicate that McNulty and Stephens were trying to play both sides: to not antagonize or perhaps even cultivate the homosexual lobby while at the same time planning to eventually kill the bill and look good to their own side in the process.
It looks like they were a little too clever for their own good (and ours) but the jury is still out. The special session convenes Monday the 14th. There are rallies at the capitol. If you can’t go, pray for success.

At the end of every legislative session for the past three years there has been a last-minute rush to get a very bad bill passed: and the House Republican leadership--Amy Stephens and Frank McNulty--have been pivotal in making it happen.

This year that bill is civil unions.

Looks like they're on a roll in the State Senate. On Thursday the 19th, the Senate passed the 2012-13 state budget, a fiscally responsible agreement, with overwhelming bipartisan support.

“This is only the second budget I have voted for in my time in the General Assembly,” said Senate Minority Leader Bill Cadman, R-Colorado Springs. “We have restored money into the emergency TABOR reserve, reinstated the senior property tax exemption and enacted a permanent 1% cut from the personnel budgets of most departments. This is a fiscally sound budget that Republicans can support.”

Joint Budget Committee member, Senator Kent Lambert, R-Colorado Springs, said “We can be proud of this year’s budget. We reduced the size of government while protecting funding for K-12 and higher education.”

The 2012-13 budget includes several Republican priorities, such as:

Saving for the future:
· Balances to the most conservative revenue forecast
· Maintains a 4% statutory reserve
· Increases liquid assets in the constitutional emergency TABOR reserve by $13 million
· Sets aside $100 million in the State Education Fund, a savings account for K-12

Funding education:
· Fully funds K-12 education on a per-student basis
· Funds the implementation of the Educator Effectiveness program, which will link teacher promotions and salaries to student academic growth
· Fully reverses the Governor’s proposed cuts to the Higher Education Colorado Opportunity Fund (COF) stipends to last year’s level and helps reduce student tuition costs

Reducing the size of government:
· Immediately reduces the excess capacity in the state’s prison system by closing one facility and funds an independent study to reduce excess capacity and costs in the future.
· Cuts 1% from the personnel budgets of most departments. Public safety personnel are exempt.
· Cuts 171.7 personnel positions

Begins the reversal of the policy of raiding cash funds and other budgeting gimmicks of the past:
· Restores all $46.8 million of severance tax funding to counties and major water projects.
· Reverses part of the “payday shift” enacted in 2003 that was used to artificially push payroll into the next fiscal year.
· Begins the process of ending the policy of tapping cash funds to pay for general fund spending.

Colorado Union of Taxpayers' (CUT) 2011 ratings of the 35 State Senators and 65 State representatives votes on tax legislation were published this week.

The redistricting maps are still being drawn and some hearings are still being held. Regardless of public input and the rules stated unilaterally by the Colorado Supreme Court, the Democrat majority are pretty much drawing the maps in ways that will serve their party control.

Since we first wrote about this in July, it has gotten worse. Compare the El Paso County House Maps below, for example.

You can find the ongoing work of the redistricting commission here, including all of the maps.

Here is the preliminary map for El Paso County as of 7/19/11:

Now look at the map drawn as of 9/9/11:

 

They've totally flipped Districts 17 and 21, created a whole new district 37 in the northern part of Colorado Springs, 16 has disappeared, 15 shrunk and moved, and 20 now extends all up and down the Front Range. Why is this much churn necessary?

 

Now look at the gerrymandering in Pueblo County: